Archive for November 11, 2007

Kentucky GOP Screws the Pooch: Attempts to Play Gay Card

I had only heard anecdotal accounts of the Gov. Ernie Fletcher campaign’s last-minute attempt to play the “Gay Card” in last week’s election debacle, but I am not surprised. He has been a complete disaster as a governor, and his campaign has been one of the worst I’ve ever seen.

  • By making his “No Casinos” pledge the centerpiece of his campaign, he framed his agenda in terms of what he was not going to do. Terrible marketing move.
  • He attempted to play the God Card, setting up the Ten Commandments in the Capitol on the day before the election.
  • He launched a last-minute telemarketing campaign to play the “Gay Card”.

The attempts to play the God and Gay cards backfired, as most Kentuckians–in spite of their conservative Christian underpinning–know when they are being played. Folks like myself and Pilgrim–religious conservatives who almost never vote Democrat–told Fletcher where to stick it.  

Before his last-minute shenanigans, I was willing to accept the premise that Fletcher was a good, decent human being who simply didn’t do a great job as governor. The hiring scandal was mostly a mistake made by people who just didn’t understand state government, although my only serious gripe was the lack of major accomplishments by Fletcher.

But his last-ditch attempt to play the traditional values ticket was senseless and shameful. He owes the Body a serious apology.

What Do You Have Against Divorced Women?

The short answer to the question: nothing. That they are divorced is tragic, as divorce is a reflection of human fallenness. (Jesus even said so himself: that it was allowed in the OT was a concession to the hardness of human hearts.) In a perfect world, there would be no divorce. Christians would only marry Christians, and would work their problems out without dissolving a covenant relationship.

That divorce exists is a human tragedy for more than the adults involved.

The real question: what about remarriage? Can I–a single man–marry a woman who is divorced?

The answer to that question has nothing to do with my sentiments toward those who are divorced. As a child, I saw two divorces. Both sucked. Trust me: I have no axe to grind with those whose marriages failed. In many cases, they had no control over that outcome.

That said, the issue is how do we reconcile very hard teachings by Jesus–and they are very hard teachings–with the reality that we do not always have control over the occurrence of divorce.

We usually have control over matters of sin. And we typically think of punishment in terms of matters over which we have control. We can choose whether to lie, whether to kill, whether to get drunk, and so forth. But divorce is not something over which we often have control. If you are a husband (or wife), you can do everything right and still find yourself served with divorce papers. If your spouse is abusive to you or the kids, or unrepentantly commits adultery, divorce may be the only viable alternative.

Must such a one be punished due to a condition over which they were either not at fault or had no control?

Jesus even suggested that women–who, in those days, were always the recipients of divorces–who were divorced were forced to commit adultery (Matthew 5). This is because a divorced woman could not just go out and get a nice job to support herself; the best income potential for a woman was prostitution. Next to that, remarriage was the lesser evil.

And make no mistake: evil is what Jesus called it: the man who marries the divorced woman commits adultery. Period.

That was a very sobering assessment, as a man who marries such a woman was saving her from a life of prostitution. Jesus called such men adulterers.

That means I–Amir Larijani–would be an adulterer if I married a divorced woman. Even if I was doing so to provide a better life for her kids. Even if I was doing a C.S. Lewis–saving her life. Even if marrying me was the difference between her having a good home and embracing an immoral lifestyle. Even if it kept me from the same.

Keep in mind that this has nothing to do with my feelings for those who are divorced, especially the ladies. It has everything to do with what Jesus said.

In the interests of fair disclosure: I have dated a woman who was divorced. We’ll call her Echo Kilo. I came pretty darn close to getting hitched with her. She shot me down, then got back together with me. When I broached the subject of marriage, she shot me down again, insisting that she could not Biblically remarry.

Not long after that, Echo self-destructed: became sexually involved with her ex-husband (who had remarried), got pregnant, had an abortion, attempted suicide, started to recover, abandoned church and family, shacked up with a man, and had an “atonement baby” for whom she was unfit to care. Other family members adopted that child. Echo has been a zombie ever since: in and out of care for bipolar disorder. No one ever suspected she was bipolar.

Back then, my views were more to the left on this issue. Largely because I had accepted conventional teachings–that divorce and remarriage were allowed for the case of adultery, abuse, unbelievers leaving unequal yokes. It made so much sense to me.But what did Scripture say? Echo Kilo’s refusal to remarry had Biblical basis, even if her self-destruction did not.

On the other hand, while remarriage would have been short of the glory for her–the fundamentalist does have a point here–it would have been better for Echo Kilo to marry than to burn. (On the other hand, I am grateful that I did not end up married to a manic depressive!)

The crux for me is this: has God called me to something better than the lesser evil? Can an older bachelor like myself–for whom available single women are scarce–have a chance of marrying someone compatible without controversy?

Keep in mind that I am quite the jubilant, happy bachelor in most respects; I hardly fall into the woe-is-me camp. The single life has its shortcomings, but there are far worse things than singleness.

When I look at the near-marriages that did not pan out–and there have been many–I am grateful that they did not. In almost every case, the prospective mate has embraced unhealthy and/or destructive paths after shooting me down. (One is dead; one went back to a reckless lifestyle; one flaked out; two went on to marry non-believers.)

This may sound cruel–although not intended that way–but while I hurt for them, I am not sorry that they didn’t marry me.

On the other hand, the Debbie Makens of the world tend to deride bachelors like myself, with the Ted Slaters of the world enabling her nonsense.

Stupid Quotes of the Day

From local heretic pastor Chuck Queen of Immanuel Baptist Church in Frankfort, Kentucky:

The old cliché, “the Bible says it and that settles it,” simply makes no sense to thoughtful Christians who recognize the diversity of the literature in the Bible and the differences in the faith perspectives of those who wrote, collected, edited and revised the sacred literature.

That’s what happens when you take a low view of Biblical authority: the truth is whatever you want it to be. You can always hide behind the “priesthood of the believer”/”we don’t really know what this passage meant because it was written in a particular time to a particular audience in a particular cultural milieu” smokescreen and justify anything.
Here is another of his gems:

One way to avoid misreading and misapplying the scriptures is by following the method of Jesus, who interpreted scripture out of a prejudice of love. If the scriptures are applied with a prejudice of love then the holy book can be instrumental in a holy life—a life that reflects the very best of the Bible, that is, a life that reflects the steadfast love and grace of God.

Yep…Jesus interpreted Scripture with a prejudice of love. Tough love. Don’t believe me?

  • Matthew 5:21-22 — You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.”
  • Matthew 5:31-32 — “It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’   But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.”
  • Matthew 10:28 — “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
  • Matthew 23:33 — “You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?
  • Matthew 10:11-14 — “Whatever town or village you enter, search for some worthy person there and stay at his house until you leave. As you enter the home, give it your greeting. If the home is deserving, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town. 15I tell you the truth, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.
  • Matthew 10:37 — “Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

There are more, but you get the picture.

While Jesus ministered grace, love, and peace, He also had the stones to tell it like it is. This is why He admonished Peter in the harshest of tones–get thee behind me, Satan–only seconds after saying, “Blessed art thou, Simon bar Jonah…” to him. (Matthew 16:17)
This is why the same Jesus ministered grace to women–from the Samaritan to the Syrophoenician to the Jewish adulteress–while excoriating religious leaders who undermined true Godliness with their extraBiblical dogmatism.

Sadly, Queen only presents the portions of Jesus with which he desires to identify. As a result, he casts himself as a left-leaning fundamentalist dogmatic. While he would be correct about many contemporary “conservatives” who have minimized the Gospel with their dogmatic substitutions for sound doctrine, he is guilty of the same thing, only coming from the left.

Where’s the News Media Now?

A few months ago, the media was buzzing over the Discovery Channel’s carrying of a story that suggested Jesus’ body has been found, complete with “evidence” that he had been married. Never mind that the “find” was over 26 years old and few scholars gave the Cameron angle any credibility. Ratings are more important than truth.

Now, reputable archaeologist has announced the discovery of Nehemiah’s wall. If this holds water–and it may very well–it would be a very serious defeat to the Biblical skeptics.

Not that I would EVER suggest that the MSM harbors any anti-Biblical prejudice. Certainly not!