New Year’s Resolutions, 2008

After spending the last few days pondering–while working out, drinking coffee, and cleaning my house–my resolutions for 2008, I think I have decided on a few. I decided to keep the list fairly short, so I will have less of a chance of losing focus. Heregoes…

1. Maintain my weight level. I’m in shape; in fact–all things being equal–probably the best shape of my life. I want to keep it that way. I’m at 135 right now, with body fat just inside 10%. I’d like to keep the body fat right where it is.

2. Read through the Bible at least once, and complete two inductive book studies. I haven’t decided on the two books yet, but I’m leaning in the direction of Proverbs and Luke. If I complete two and am on a role, I might throw another study–probably Mark–into the mix.

3. Gain at least a functional (written) knowledge of at least one foreign language. I speak English and Redneck, but really want to expand my horizons. Being of Iranian descent, Farsi is one choice, but I’m leaning more in the direction of Spanish or Chinese, as those are the two that will probably become increasingly dominant.

4. Gain a better proficiency in data warehousing and newer, emergent programming/development technologies. I want to keep a leg up on where my organization–or what is going to be left of it–is going.

There are other things that I would like to accomplish, but those do not rise to the level of “resolutions”. I’ll see how this works out on 31 December 2008.

To the rest of you, Happy New Year!

Vox Day Reviews “Liberal Fascism”

Christian uber-libertarian columnist Vox Day, in his weekly column, provides a really nice review of Jonah Goldberg’s book Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning.

I’ve always considered fascists, communists, and all brands of socialists–including national socialists (nazis)–in the same boat. Just different flavors. They all believe in the centralization of government and the harnessing of economic and political power to benefit the people. Some–such as the soft socialism of Western Europe–are more benevolent albeit inefficient while others–such as the Stalinist USSR, Mao’s China, Hitler’s Germany, and Mussolini’s Italy–were notoriously brutal and destructive.

Each requires a large government apparatus; each requires a police state; each requires government control of economic assets.

For the better part of the last eight decades, the American Left has embraced those ideals. While very few of them would call themselves doctrinal communists, many of them would privately say, “Ya know, communism (or socialism) could work, if the right people were in charge.” They view themselves as “the right people”.

Sadly, the GOP has also embraced that same fascist framework, as they have become a party of big, authoritarian government. Whereas Reagan moved in the direction of more personal liberties and freer markets, the modern GOP has foisted increased federal monstrosities in education (No Child Left Behind), health care (Medicare Part D), defense (an endless, protracted, war that will cost trillions of dollars), and economics (with spending on steroids).

Ergo, this election season, among the top-tier candidates (Hillary Hussein Edwards and Rudy McHuckarompson) you have a choice between left-leaning fascists and right-leaning variations of the same. The GOP will give you Herod the Great (Rudy), Caiaphas (Mitt), Herod Antipas (McCain), and Pilate (Huckabee). The DNC will give you Jezebel (Hillary), Ahab (Obama), and a kinder, gentler Karl Marx (Edwards).