Those who’ve been following this blog have known that I’ve long identified as a Patriarch from day one. And in fact, I still do, although I am a laid-back one.
At the same time, it’s fair to say that it’s long past time to soberly assess the state of gender relations in the Church. #churchtoo has exposed the dark side of Patriarchy and complementarianism, and–make no mistake–that side is VERY dark.
First, some disclaimers:
- I do not pedastal women by any stretch. Each sex has ways that their depravity rears its ugly head.
- Men and women have been at each others’ throats ever since Adam threw Eve under the bus and even blamed God for providing her to him. Ever since then, women have had a “Men: can’t live with them/can’t live without them” mindset and men have sought to impose varying structures on women.
- Yes, women abuse men too. Ame has provided horror stories about how this has gone on in apparently “good Christian homes” over the years. Those who know DV really well will attest that women can and do abuse men.
- Yes, women abuse children, too. The ranks of women teachers who slept with their students are staggering, and seem to be ever-expanding.
Having said all of that, I’m going to lay the cards on the table:
#CHURCHTOO IS ALMOST ENTIRELY ON THE MEN
Don’t like that? Fine. I don’t either. But not liking that fact doesn’t make it less true. And make no mistake, it is fact.
Why is it fact? It is fact because IT HAPPENED ON THE WATCH OF MEN.
Yes, #churchtoo abuses have occurred–and do occur–in egalitarian churches. Even then, (a) most of the abusers are men, and (b) most of those who covered up the abuses are men.
But here’s the thing…Complementarians and even Patriarchs often contend that a Patriarchal structure protects women. And in theory, it ought to.
But it almost NEVER does.
The Southern Baptist Convention–which has codified complementarianism into their Baptist Faith and Message–has 700 cases of sexual abuse in front of them, in which there is actionable intelligence that they can act on TODAY, and yet they will not act on them.
There are ministers cited–who have felony sex abuse convictions–who still retain ministerial credentials.
There are others–whose abuses have been verified as they have admitted to their abuses–who retain ministerial credentials.
There are churches–shown to have covered for sexual abusers–who retain standing as chucrches “in cooperation” with the SBC.
I know of churches–that ordained abusive ministers–who have been petitioned to defrock ministers shown to be abusive. And yet those churches refuse to act.
(In the SBC, ordination is handled through the local church; to defrock a minister, the ordaining church has to do it. I have yet to see one case where they have done this.)
Fact is, when children report abuse, churches almost always cover it up in some form or other. This is not merely a Roman Catholic phenomenon; it is rampant among evangelical ranks. Especially complementarian and Patriarchal (C/P) ranks.
The latter is what I find bothersome.
In the C/P world, you often hear much talk about manhood and masculinity.
Men are supposed to be leaders, shepherds, protectors, pastors of their own homes. Men are supposed to be the leaders in Church, home, and general society.
Now here’s the thing: LEADERSHIP carries RESPONSIBILITY.
So why aren’t these patriarchs and complementarian Manly Men leaders being decisive about abuses by their own peers in clergy?
(I know the answer; I’m asking the question rhetorically.)
Why is it that a cadre of Manly Men–who are so decisive when it comes to planting churches to build their brand, or developing conferences to make their names great–can’t muster the courage to be decisive and call out their own ranks who abuse women and children and cover for those who do?
Why is it that a cadre of Manly Men in the SBC has sought to impugn the character of prominent women calling out these abuses, no matter how conservative they are?
The Founders–a shady group of SBC leaders trying to control the SBC, run by Tom Ascol–launched passive-aggressive attacks on Rachael Denhollander, who is herself a Reformed Baptist (a “1689er”). I can attest that she is not a Social Justice Warrior and is in fact very conservative.
Make no mistake: #churchtoo is on the boyz. And while I identify as a Patriarch, we need to be honest: the leaders in that sector don’t seem to want to move to clear the abusers out of their ranks.
They lecture us about manhood and courage, but they exercise neither when it involves calling out leaders in their own tribe.
That’s just the beginning. More to come…