Home > Christian Life, Family > The Greatest Response Yet for SAHMs

The Greatest Response Yet for SAHMs

Ted Slater of Boundless–who, admirably, chose to tread very carefully–opened up a discussion this week regarding the gender imbalance in higher education: in undergrad studies, the students were 60% women to 40% men. He expressed concern over that, and–attempting to avoid a conversation that devolved into a sexist food fight–stated some very good points. I will provide them, with emphasis added.

Call me a sexist, but my first reaction is to find that disappointing. Call me a sexist, but I believe that in most cases the husband should be the primary income-earner in the family, and that the wife should be free to stay at home with the kids. It follows, logically I think, that more men should be preparing for these income-earning careers by going to college. And that women should be careful not to bring on exorbitant school loan debt that may prohibit them from being able to carry out their dreams to be stay-at-home moms.

Oh, this blog post is so politically incorrect. A chunk of our readers are going to misinterpret what I’m saying, insisting that I believe women should be ignorant and that they are only qualified to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. I’m not saying that. I married a woman with a master’s degree, after all. Another chunk of our readers are going to say that I’m subtly characterizing men, who attend college at a rate less than women, as irresponsible gamers who are prolonging their adolescence out of fear of taking on responsibility. I’m not saying that either.

I am saying, though, that I find these stats to be puzzling. Sure, some of the non-college-going men may be attending trade schools or taking on careers that don’t require college. And many of the college-attending women may be pursuing lower-cost liberal arts degrees that make them more well-rounded, that give them opportunities to meet their husband, that don’t rack up the debt, that equip them to take on jobs while awaiting Mr. Right.

Before I provide the best response of all time–from a blogger named Jenny–I will provide my thoughts:

  1. Ted is speaking to the general, not to the universal. He said “in most cases, the husband should be the primary income-earner int he family.” BTW: that is usually true anyway, even if the wife works full-time.
  2. On the issue of debt, Ted is on the money. If a woman has large amounts of debt, she may find herself forced to work full-time during her childbearing years–longer than she would have planned. My only issue with Ted on this: the debt is every bit as serious if the men run it up.

I have more to offer, but that’s coming later. Now, for the best response of all time:

Why are people so offended at this? It’s biblical that women should be primary homemakers, helpers to their husbands, and caretakers to their children. It’s biblical that men should be primary breadwinners. Read Genesis 3 (and the rest of the bible).

For men: 1 Timothy 5:8 “But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”

For women: Titus 2:3-5 “…the older women likewise, that they be reverent in behavior, not slanderers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things – that they admonish the young women to love thier husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, homemakers, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be blasphemed.”

I don’t know what it’s like in the States, but in Canada, undergrad students finish with an average of $20,000 debt. Paying that back at 7-10% interest per annum and it adds up pretty quickly. Since a woman’s main responsibility in marriage is in the home, obviously she should be pretty careful about racking up that kind of debt (and often more).

That being said, if you can take care of that primary responsibility and also find creative ways to pursue a career (whether that’s part time, work from home, even full time out of the home at some point), I don’t think there’s a problem with that. Nor do I believe it’s contrary to Scripture IF you’ve got your priorities right. Although I’d hope you wouldn’t be working full time from the month your child was born – even the secular world recognizes that’s not good.

Obviously Ted’s not advocating that women don’t get educated. He’s just suggesting that we women make informed decisions with a biblical perspective on the long-term that won’t force us to compromise our biblical responsibilities, and that men take their responsibility as providers seriously.

And if we women are prone to bristling at the idea that we might just have to make some tough decisions about our education or our careers, perhaps the problem’s with us. If we’re upset about the possibility that we might just have a responsibility to our families that might just mean that we actually live our lives selflessly on occasion, and not exactly as we might want, maybe we need to spend more time studying the Word and the humility and love Christ demonstrated to us, that we’re supposed to be mirrorring.

I know I’m sometimes frustrated because I know that marrying (which I’m doing in 3 weeks) and having children (which Lord-willing will happen within a few years), will mean that I can’t do exactly what I want. If I had it my own selfish way, I wouldn’t stay home with the kids. I’d make sure I was educated and able to pursue my career as much as my little wretched heart desires. But it’s good to remember that selfishness, no matter what noble guise we might hide it under, is NOT a Christian virtue.

Isn’t the Christian life all about denying self??? Isn’t that what it means to follow Christ? Aren’t we supposed to be putting off that old nature that only wants to look out for Number 1???

It doesn’t necessarily mean that we give everything up – obviously it is important to use the gifts the Lord gives us, and to pursue opportunities he opens up – but there will be times when we have to make tough decisions about giving some things up that we’d really, really like.

That last sentence is priceless. Both husbands and wives need to take huge stock in this: marriage is not all about you, and you each will be forced to make sacrifices, even give up things you enjoyed in your single life, for the good of the covenant.

Score one for Ted. Score a BIG one for Jennie. Hat tip to Christina for alerting me to it.

Categories: Christian Life, Family Tags:
  1. Adam T.
    April 9th, 2008 at 19:46 | #1

    Wow, she’s got a good head on her shoulders.

    Somewhat off-topic: You know what I get such a kick out of? These people – and I don’t just mean at Boundless, but all over the internet – who jump into a discussion for the sole purpose of crying about how ‘offended’ they are by whatever’s previously been said. (As if the mere fact that you were ‘offended’ is supposed to mean anything or carry any weight to anyone!)

  2. April 9th, 2008 at 20:18 | #2

    this is EXCELLENT.

    funny, i was just thinking along these lines earlier this evening. one of the things the last hundred years has given us is the opportunity to find out how amazingly God created our human bodies … how much we can accomplish … how many varried things we can excel at. we’ve had more opportunity to discover these things about us than ever before in history.

    and somewhere along the way, we’ve decided that if we can do it well, and excel at ‘it,’ then we should do it. absolutely nothing could be farther from the truth.

    i think it’s incredibly amazing how much we can do within our humanity. perhaps that reality calls us to a greater sacrifice of ourselves for the glory and purposes of God.

    there are an infinite number of things i can do well, but God has not called me to an infinite number of things. He has called me to where i am right now … and YES, that does mean sacrificing a LOT that i can do well, and even enjoy, to do what i should be doing right now.

    someone on boundless wrote about ‘forsaking’ all others when married (i think it was on boundless). he said that once married, there are still many to choose from, but God has called us to choose to forsake those to keep our hearts pure for the one we’re in marriage covenant with. wow … is that ever true. i cannot tell you how many opportunities i had to run off with another man while i was married … but i had made a choice, and i continued to make that choice … way up at the top of the line … before anything could ever have come out of it.

    i think ‘careers’ or ‘life choices’ are a lot like that. we need to follow God where He leads … some is very clear in the Bible, as Jenny so eloquently and poignantly stated … some takes more discernment (which is where Charles makes a lot of really good points and clarifications).

    we need to actively ‘choose’ what God desires for us … and then we need to actively ‘forsake’ everything else.

    EXCELLENT.

  3. April 9th, 2008 at 20:28 | #3

    She made my day. Its like I’ve been trying to articulate that for SO long…and in she comes in one fell swoop.

    It was awesome =)

    Still, no one even bothers to acknowledge her points and still continue to argue…

    Kinda frustrating, but still :) She made my day.

  4. April 10th, 2008 at 16:17 | #4

    Jennie REALLY made a big impression…Ted just dedicated an entire blog to her comment…

  5. April 10th, 2008 at 16:20 | #5

    congrats on the hat tip, Amir!!! :)

  6. Adam T.
    April 10th, 2008 at 16:56 | #6

    Still, no one even bothers to acknowledge her points and still continue to argue…

    That’s how the internet works… that’s why I prefer talking with – not to – you guys here (for example) rather than over at Boundless, or any other place, for the most part.

  7. Adam T.
    April 10th, 2008 at 16:59 | #7

    BTW, didja notice you got a hat-tip, Amir? Ted reads you! :)

  8. April 10th, 2008 at 19:14 | #8

    Adam: I didn’t immediately notice that. LOL

  1. No trackbacks yet.